ObjectivismOnline.net Logo  
HomeForumAbout UsWeb LinksWikiPhoto GalleryFliersMember BlogsArt GalleryCalendarEssays

The Objectivism Online Meta-Blog

A pro-reason, pro-capitalism Objectivist Meta-Blog

Objectivism Meta-Blog
Archives :: Submit a post :: Atom Feed :: RDF Feed :: Admin Login

« The One Minute Case Against Wage and Price Controls | Main

March 7, 2009

Evil or stupid, he stuffs the beast.

By Gus Van Horn from Gus Van Horn,cross-posted by MetaBlog

It seems I'm not the only one asking asking whether Barack Obama is evil or stupid. Myrhaf comments on Roger Kimball's raising the same question.
... Obama could not do better at harming our economy if he was trying. Since his election, Americans have watched their life savings disappear on the stock market. Kimball lists some of Obama's destructive policies. [bold added]
The executive summary is that Obama has pretended to lower taxes for most Americans, raised taxes directly and by closing loopholes, and proposed a national fossil fuel rationing scheme. (And I agree with Myrhaf that Obama is essentially a villain.)

Two articles I encountered this morning at RealClear Politics convey both the destructiveness of Obama's agenda and what might be his underlying strategy.

First, Stuart Taylor of National Journal crunches some numbers. The below is just one of the more compelling paragraphs, and it doesn't really touch the deception behind Obama's budget projections:
The numbers don't add up -- and still won't if and when, as seems almost certain, Obama ratchets up his so-far-fairly-modest new taxes on the top 2 percent. "A tax policy that confiscated 100 percent of the taxable income of everyone in America earning over $500,000 in 2006 would only have given Congress an extra $1.3 trillion in revenue," according to a February 27 editorial in The Wall Street Journal. "That's less than half the 2006 federal budget of $2.7 trillion and looks tiny compared to the more than $4 trillion Congress will spend in fiscal 2010. Even taking every taxable 'dime' of everyone earning more than $75,000 in 2006 would have barely yielded enough to cover that $4 trillion." [bold added]
One British outlet puts the consequence of his $4 trillion budget very succinctly: "If he's wrong he could bankrupt the whole country." He is wrong, but what might he hope to achieve?

For that, we can turn to Ross Douthat, as quoted by Mickey Kaus, who names the strategy, "stuffing the beast":
Obama's spending proposals would ... create new spending commitments and run up large deficits, in the hopes that the dollars poured into health care and education will create a new baseline for government's obligations, which in turn will create the political space for tax increases on the middle class. Like the starve-the-beast approach, the Obama strategy puts off the hard part till tomorrow: Give them tax cuts today, conservatives said, and they'll swallow spending cuts tomorrow; give them universal health care, universal pre-K, subsidies for green industry and all the rest of it today, liberals seem to be thinking, and they'll be willing to pay for it tomorrow. ...

[I]f you can change the baseline of social spending that Americans expect from their government before that day of hard choices arrive - and once created, government programs are awfully hard to get rid of, whether they're actually effective or not - then you've tilted the landscape of negotiation in liberalism's favor, and ensured that a post-Obama entitlement compromise will look a lot more like social democracy than a pre-Obama compromise would have. [bold added]
Consider, for example, how many Americans are already (wrongly) indignant about paying for medical care as it is. Widespread hardship would cause many to want whatever relief they could get from the government, compounding the political difficulty of repealing any growth in the size of the welfare state.

This reminds me of an interview I saw about twenty years ago in which someone from Britain described how radically Margaret Thatcher had altered the debate over the role of government. He likened what she did to changing the catch on a ratchet wrench so that any movement resulted in more freedom.

Obama's goal is simple. He wants to ratchet America into socialism, and he sees this crisis as his big chance.

-- CAV

Originally posted by Gus Van Horn from Gus Van Horn, ReBlogged for Meta Blog

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.objectivismonline.net/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/2656


Objectivism Online Recent Forum Posts
  • This is madness
  • Altruism=evil, does that mean charity = evil?
  • Subjective vs Objective Theory of Value
  • Homosexuality vs. Heterosexuality
  • Freedom of speech in the military
  • Anarchism (Specific Critique)
  • Introductions, apologies, explanations, and etc.
  • China's reaction to US-Taiwan Arms Sales
  • Unofficial Index to Dr. Peikoff's Podcasts
  • Marxist Ethnic Studies Professor
  • Objectivism ticked off my best friend
  • Superbowl
  • Conformity as an enemy of self-esteem
  • Good looks as a rational value
  • Sarah Palin's Tea Party Speech
  • Lisa Cuddy on House M.D. as Dagny Taggart
  • NFL 2009
  • I walk the Line
  • Craig Biddle to speak at OSU!
  • Corporate Personhood


  • Latest Essays
  • Rick Warren: Master Assimilator for the Christian Collective
  • Billy Graham and the Christian Crusade Against Truth and Freedom
  • Sean Hannity and the Tactics of the Enemy
  • Rush Limbaugh: Voice of the Religious Threat in America
  • Barriers to Entry in the Canadian Labor Market - by Alexander Marriott


  • Latest News
  • Announcing the Egosphere!
  • Announcing the Premium Forums!
  • New Amazon Search Box
  • New Objectivism Wiki!
  • Syndicate Us!


  • The Objectivism Wiki: Recent Changes



    January 2010
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
              1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31            


    Meta-Blog Archives
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • February 2003
  • October 1998


  • Recent Meta-Blog Entries
  • GOP Joins Thought Police
  • Mayor Bloomberg: The Gun-Toting Nanny
  • Quick Roundup 497
  • A Clear Agenda of Repeal
  • Brook on the Estate Tax
  • Hearts of Darkness
  • More on Gay Marriage
  • Quick Roundup 496
  • A World without Nuclear Weapons?
  • Not Unintended Consequences



  • Google






    Who's Online
    We have 2 guests and 4 members online
    Random Image
    No Images
    Random Quote
    Login Form





    Lost Password?
    No account yet? Register

    Warning: Parameter 1 to modules_html::module() expected to be a reference, value given in C:\www\ObjectivismOnline\includes\Cache\Lite\Function.php on line 92
    Newsfeeds





     
     
    Powered by Joomla | Designed by David Veksler